Shimano Fishing Stella FD Spinning Reel Review

Shimano Stella FD Spinning Reel Review
Of course everyone knows what a Stella is. To us fishermen it's what a  Rolls Royce is to cars, a James Purdey is to guns/rifles, or a Patek  Philippe to watches. They always had this reputation, but in reality it  has not always been completely accurate. Many haven't heard of the  Stella before 1998, but that was the second (or third depending on how  you look at it) generation of Stellas. The very first Stella came in  1992-3. Here is a photo of a vintage 1993 Stella 6000.

Since the beginning, they made the Stella as a fully metal reel equipped  with the best technology available at the time without much attention  to cost. Daiwa on the other hand was trying to catch up with their top  of the range Team Daiwa Z (freshwater) and Team Daiwa X (saltwater).  Excellent reels, but they fell short of dethroning the Stella as the  finest reels in the world. One of my very first reviews was in 1999  which was a comparison between Stella 16000F and Team Daiwa TDX6000HIA,  both over the US$550 mark which was really out there by the standards of  that time. I fished the Cape with both, and the Stella proved to be  tougher, smoother, and to have a better drag. This situation was about  to change in 2001 though. Daiwa came up with a new truly revolutionary  reel with a sexy name: Saltiga. Die hard fans still would not accept  that Stella was no longer #1, but in a review 
I've written in 2003,  I used my own experience with both Saltiga 6000 and Stella 20000FA  (2001 generation of Stella), and concluded that the Daiwa was the new  #1.
Saltiga was way ahead of its time. They had Digigears which were 3D  computer designed and cut to achieve perfect meshing between the drive  and pinion gears to the last curvature. That provided unrivaled  smoothness, and durability like nothing I've seen before. The gears  themselves were made of very strong materials. The pinion was machined  stainless steel, and the drive gear was also machined from a very tough  bronze/aluminum alloy C6191 known as "Marine Bronze". That gearing was  incredible. I've worn out the stainless steel gearing of a Fin-Nor Ahab  in less than 2 years, and when I sold the Twinspin 30 it had developed a  considerable play in the gears from wear, while the Saltiga has been  serving me for the past 6 years and the gears show no notable wear. It  was a changing point in my thinking. Started to believe that maybe how  the gears are made is a bigger factor in their strength/durability than  merely the materials. My Saltiga has taken hundreds of hard fighting  fish, including my specialty vertical winching of Groupers with all the  stress this puts on gears, and they held up just fine. The Stella FA had  an Aluminum drive gear and a brass pinion, which many could tell didn't  stay as tight for long. The Saltiga also came with the first ever one  piece bail wire, which gave flawless line transition to the roller, and  was proof to a notorious problem with the 1998 Stella (F series) which  was wires coming off the roller assembly. Saltiga had a mechanical  emergency anti-reverse (again, a first in spinners) to kick in if a  slippage occurs in the one way instant roller clutch. A smart move and a  better idea than putting TWO separate roller clutches as they did in  the heavy and clumsy Team Daiwa TDX6000.
The Saltiga had a one piece machined handle which was, well, not  exactly one piece. It had a stainless steel threaded tube inserted and  secured by a screw to attach to the gear axle. The handle could better  be described as a "jointless" handle, which while sacrificing the  ability to fold for easier transportation, gives a very solid and  positive feel that nothing can rival. And staying there, the reel had  the male threads machined in the gear axle itself, while the female  threads were placed in the handle.

That was a new one, as in nearly every other spinning reel the gear has  the female and the handle has the male axles. What this did was making  the gear axle much thinner than usual. This is not hard to imagine: A  female tube will always be thicker than the male in order to receive it.  So by putting the male on the gear axle, they managed to make it  incredibly thin.

Why is it good? Well, the best work transmission and efficiency is found  in bevel gears. Bevel gears are gears where the axis of the pinion  intersects with the axis of the drive gear as in this illustration.

This  efficient arrangement is found on reels we all know like Mitchell 488, 
Penn  720/722, and Van Staal. The problem here was that those reels could not  change handle to the other side because the axis of the main gear could  not be extended to the other side of the body because the main shaft  was in the way. Pretty simple to understand, just read it again and  you'll get it.
In reels with handles that could be attached to both sides, which are  the most common today, Hypoid gearing is used. The pinion is a little  offset, the axes of both gears do not intersect, hence the axle of the  main gear could be extended to the other side of the reel's body to  receive the handle. This illustration shows Hypoid gears.

This arrangement is very convenient, but work  transmission is not as perfect as in bevel gears. Back to the Saltiga,  the use of a very thin gear axle (thanks to it being male, not female)  allowed them to lower the position of the gear a few millimeters to be  as close as possible to the most efficient position which is of course  impossible to achieve here. This offered the best efficiency in any reel  that has an ambidextrous handle. Again, read it once more if you don't  get it, and you'll have the answer to a question few out of the Saltiga  design team can answer: Why is the male part in the drive gear and not  the handle? Daiwa called it "Minimum offset gear", and it could be felt  working when cranking under load. If you've used one enough, you can  tell that it has an incredible cranking power. Finally not to stray far,  the Saltiga was waterproof,.not just water resistant like the Stella  FA.
The only thing the 2001 Stella had over the Saltiga was the drag. Both  reels could put 30KG of drag, but at high drag settings (over about  16KG), Saltiga's drag had a felt starting inertia, that in some cases  led to breakages of the stem of the smaller models, and in at least one  documented case a breakage of the bail arm on a large model.
Starting inertia in a nutshell could be explained  as follows: Newton says that a static body tends to stay static, and a  moving body tends to keep moving. So, a static spool set at 18KG of drag  will not move on 18KG pull, but it will need a starting pull of  anything from 20-23KG to start moving, then once mobile it will start  giving line at the original 18KG until it stops and starts again. The  difference between the drag setting and the initial pull required to  start it is what makes a good drag and a bad one. Obviously, in the  Saltiga a considerably big pull is required to start it moving at those  high settings, which results in a felt jerk. When the braid is too  strong and the drag is very high, a breakage could result from this  phenomena as illustrated in the photo above. The Stella FA did not have  this jerk because it had bigger drag washers on the bottom of the spool  as well as a small stack on top of it, thus achieving the same braking  power at much less stress than in the Saltiga.
Thanks : http://www.ausfish.com.au/vforum/showthread.php?t=146973